New Feature: SPSQ Low Score Comment Prompts

Low Score Comment Prompts

Better understand patient concerns with our low-score survey logic, now included on our Standard Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (SPSQ). When patients select a score of a ‘1’ or ‘2’ on the five-point Likert scale for any standard survey question, they will be prompted to leave a comment describing their experience in that area.

The long-term use of this feature on our Anesthesia Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ2) has been effective in helping providers to better understand trends and improvement opportunities in specific areas. These prompts encourage patients to include details about a specific part of their experience, providing deeper insights than often gained with generalized comment prompts at the end of a survey. Please note, there will be no change to the existing SPSQ comment questions with the addition of the low score prompts.

To gain even more insight from your patient feedback, use our sentiment analysis tool to review patient low score comments. This will help you to identify the most critical feedback quickly.

Have questions about this new feature or the SPSQ survey? Chat with us using the blue chat icon below, or reach out to your client account manager. Interested in learning more about SurveyVitals? Request a demo of the solution here.

December 16th, 2019 Categories: featured, Outpatient Practice, Patient Experience, Product Features

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Surveys You Might Not Know SurveyVitals Offers

4 survey types you may not know SurveyVitals offers

SurveyVitals’ digital patient experience surveys help you gain a deeper understanding of your performance with immediate patient feedback. Did you know our solution includes many more surveys at no additional cost to help drive improvement from every angle of your practice?

1. Point of Care

Our Point of Care tool allows you to address patient concerns on the spot before the leave your facility. The survey is sent to patients on their own devices while they’re still onsite, giving you the opportunity to resolve concerns in real-time.

2. Outcomes Surveys
Global Surgical Outcomes Survey (GSOS)

The GSOS survey is sent to surgical patients post-visit to collect feedback about the recovery experience. GSOS works in sync with the Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) model and ERAS guidelines to identify gaps in care and spot opportunities to improve outcomes.

Emergency Medicine Outcomes Survey (EMOS)

The EMOS survey is sent to patients following an Emergency Department visit. It collects patient feedback related to understanding the recovery plan and accessibility to follow-up care.

3. 360° Surveys

As a part of our 360° solution, we offer a variety of internal and stakeholder surveys to help you better understand the perceptions of employees, peers, surgeons, physicians, and third party groups who work with your organization.

Employee Satisfaction

The Employee Satisfaction survey collects feedback to help increase teamwork, reduce turnover, and keep your teams motivated. The survey assesses individual employee perceptions about the organization, professional interactions, performance, job duties, and more.

Peer-to-Peer

The Peer-to-Peer survey aims to increase accountability and awareness of workplace conflict. Employees rate their peers in a number of areas including attitude, communication, competency, responsibility, teamwork, and timeliness.

Physician Satisfaction

Intended to prevent physician burnout, the Physician Satisfaction survey gathers insights from physicians about their quality of life in the workplace. Drive positive change with candid feedback from your physicians in a number of areas.

Referring Physician

Maximize your referral opportunities with the Referring Physician survey. Receive feedback from referring physicians on reports, recommendations, and interpretations they receive.

Anesthesiologist Surgeon Satisfaction

The Anesthesiologist Surgeon Satisfaction Questionnaire gathers important input from surgeons who work alongside anesthesia providers. This survey gives anesthesia providers valuable insights to strengthen relationships and increase safety and efficiency.

Third Party Group Evaluation

Enhance your third party relationships with feedback from your hospital and facility partners about your care, safety, responsiveness, clinical competency, cost efficiency, support, and more.

4. CAHPS

SurveyVitals is certified by CMS to administer nine different CAHPS surveys. The transition to value-based care has made CAHPS surveys mandatory for many facilities. The CAHPS surveys we offer are:

Note: There may be an additional cost to administer CAHPS surveys.

Questions?

Have questions about the SurveyVitals solution or any of the surveys we offer? Reach out to us today at support@surveyvitals.com or contact us using the blue chat icon below.

August 28th, 2019 Categories: Anesthesia, CAHPS Surveys, Emergency Medicine, featured, Outpatient Practice, Patient Experience

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Patient Experience Week Winners!

Patient Experience Week Giveaway

April 22-26 was Patient Experience Week and to celebrate, we asked our clients to share what drives them to provide memorable patient care. Those who responded were eligible to win an Amazon gift card. We’re excited to announce the winners of the giveaway and to share what motivates and inspires them to provide an exceptional patient experience!

We asked: It's Patient Experience Week! Tell us what inspires you to work every day to provide amazing care to your patients.

Grand Prize Winner: Clint Allred, CRNA, Anesthesia Associates of Boise

Clint Allred Patient Experience Week

“I work at a fairly average sized hospital with ten operating rooms in which we do all kinds of surgeries and care for all types of patients. It is a job that is always moving and often requires stretching of one’s abilities clinically and also professionally within our anesthesia group. Sometimes amidst the day to day providing of anesthesia, combined with the complexity of hospital bureaucracy, the patient and their experience can sometimes be forgotten. At some point in all of our careers, we got into the medical field because of our desire to care for other people. For some that motivation is fast forgotten and never found again. For me growing up, it was my younger brother who instilled this desire in me. He had serious handicaps and spent a lot of his life in and out of hospitals. Our experience was so dependent on those caring for him, for better or worse, those providers served as the rudder for our interactions with healthcare. I wanted to have a strong and helpful influence so that others could have their burden lightened.

Recently, my eight year old son had his tonsils removed. This is a very routine case, millions are done each year, and I provide the anesthesia for 6-8 of these types of cases at least once a week in our practice. The anesthetic for this case has become routine and mundane for me personally. All of a sudden I was thrust onto the other side of the experience. There my son laid on the gurney getting prepped for surgery. I saw him run the gamut of emotions; fear, anxiety, apprehension, concern...etc. All of a sudden those emotions of why I went into medicine came flooding back. I realized that the way I interacted with patients would leave a lasting impact on them. Clinically I have always provided my best care and effort, but I saw through my boy's eyes that I could do more and be more as a clinician. My son received incredible care and has since healed from his physical incisions, but the experience he had prior to surgery has had a far greater impact.

It is this message that inspires me to provide amazing care to my patients. No matter how routine or regular a procedure is to me, I remember that experience and hold strong to the fact that it is not routine for the patient on the stretcher.”


Alexis Haney, RN, USAP

“To be a caring voice to a person who didn't wake up wanting to be sick or have surgery. Everyday, I partner with SurveyVitals because in the background, almost every patient is given a chance to have a voice. I am that individual that gets to read their thoughts, their frustrations, their fears. I am able to offer them a chance to make a difference when they are in a position where they feel they have little control. When a patient requests to be called back... I can be the caring voice on the other end and I can convey to them I really do care, perhaps that will make them feel a little better and perhaps I can make a change or help their concern because USAP cares and wants to be better and that why I am inspired to provide amazing care and support to patients.”


Tina Eide, MD, Matrix Anesthesia

“Anesthesia is a tricky job, because everything is fine until it’s really not fine. It requires constant vigilance and care, even when I show up feeling less than 100%. On these days, I look to my patients for energy and strength, because I know they are relying on me for the same. I love learning about their careers, seeing pictures of their children and pets, hearing their songs they belt out (people love singing to me!), and listening to their stories that brought them to surgery. I’ve met musicians, politicians, hospital administrators, teachers, circus performers, professional athletes, prima ballerinas, and so very many people who have interesting stories. Because we often cannot share details of our patients with our families or friends, I hold these private encounters with special regard.”


Rhina Romera, Envision Healthcare

“Working in healthcare makes a difference in people's lives. Caring for people and helping others lead healthy lives is satisfying and important. I love humankind and it is gratifying to me to make a positive impact not just on patients but everyone involved. No one likes to be ill, so it is very important to me that patients feel that they are treated with compassion and respect.”


Sarah Russell, FNP, Wellspring Health Services

“The one thing that inspires me the most to provide excellent care is when patients follow up and start feeling so much better! I have also had patients tell me that for the first time they felt like a provider actually listened to them and cared about their story and their health. Oftentimes a patient's story will give the clues to their disease processes and struggles and be the beginning of the answer in leading them back to health. Without listening to the patient, it is often a matter of just cold medicine treatment that can leave the patient sicker rather than better.”


Anne LeBlanc, USAP

“For us providers, our days can often seem routine. Remembering that for our patients, surgery is often a very scary and powerless position to be in. Connecting with the patient and family in the preoperative area and forming a trustworthy bond is one of the most inspiring and valuable parts of our job. Being able to relieve some of that anxiety and comfort them in their time of fear is incredibly rewarding and inspiring for me.”


Thank you to all of our clients who took the time to share their stories! We admire your dedication to the patient experience.

May 23rd, 2019 Categories: Anesthesia, Best Practices, Client Spotlight, Outpatient Practice, Patient Experience

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Introducing the SurveyVitals Improvement Center!

Introducing SurveyVitals Improvement Center

SurveyVitals is excited to announce the launch of the Improvement Center in our client portal!

Our reporting, alerts, and dashboards have given our clients the real-time data needed to identify trends and work toward improving the patient experience. The Improvement Center takes the solution to the next level with a wealth of educational videos and articles to aid providers in targeting improvement where it is needed most.

To get started using the Improvement Center, login to your portal and click ‘Improvement Center’ in the left navigation. Browse general resources on the Improvement Center homepage, or view resources by survey. Survey-specific content is broken down by question group.

Not sure where to start? Use the Report Builder to analyze your data and comments and identify improvement opportunities. Then utilize the resources in the Improvement Center to gain a better understanding of what may help your patients in those areas.

SurveyVitals created the Improvement Center using input from top performers combined with extensive scientific-based research into the patient experience. Check back often for new content as our improvement resources evolve and grow with your solution.

Learn More!

May 6th, 2019 Categories: Anesthesia, featured, Outpatient Practice, Patient Experience, Product Features

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

MACRA Quality Payment Program: MIPS 2020

The Quality Payment Program (QPP) falls under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). It is a value-based program that determines reimbursement for clinicians treating Medicare patients.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently released the final rule outlining the Quality Payment Program (QPP) for 2020. Keep reading to learn how the changes could affect you, and how SurveyVitals can help your organization meet reporting requirements.

Who Participates?

If you bill Medicare Part B more than $90,000 in allowed charges per year and provide over 200 covered professional services under the Physician Fee Schedule for more than 200 unique Medicare patients a year, then you are part of the QPP. If you do not meet all three criteria, you could be exempt from participating in the program in 2019 under the the low-volume threshold exemption. Beginning in 2019, clinicians who meet the low-volume threshold may still opt in to MIPS if they meet at least one criterion.

Eligible clinicians under the program include:
  • Physicians
  • Physician assistants
  • Nurse practitioners
  • Clinical nurse specialists
  • Certified registered nurse anesthetists
  • Physical therapists
  • Occupational therapists
  • Qualified speech-language pathologists
  • Qualified audiologists
  • Clinical psychologists
  • Registered dietitian or nutrition professionals

If you are unsure if you are required to participate in MIPS, CMS has provided a resource to check your status by entering your NPI into an eligibility “calculator.” Additionally, the agency plans to send letters to clinicians notifying them of their eligibility in 2020.

MIPS Eligibility

Two Tracks: Which is right for you?

There are two participation tracks in the Quality Payment Program. Most Medicare Part B clinicians and groups will fall under the Merit Incentive Payment System (MIPS) track, while a smaller percentage will qualify to participate in the Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APM) track if considered an “advanced APM.” It is important to note that those APM models which are not considered “advanced” by CMS will still participate in the MIPS track.

Learn more about APMs here.

The MIPS Track

You will receive a performance-based adjustment to your Medicare fee schedule in 2022 based on your performance in 2020. The amount of the adjustment, either positive, negative, or neutral, is based on an eligible clinician or group’s Composite Performance Score (CPS). The CPS is calculated using data across four categories of measurement:

  1. Quality
  2. Promoting Interoperability
  3. Improvement Activities
  4. Cost

MIPS Category Weights

How do I avoid a negative payment adjustment?

For the 2020 performance year, CMS extended a portion of the “pick your pace” program, allowing clinicians to submit just 90 consecutive days of performance data for the required measures in the Improvement Activities and Promoting Interoperability categories. However, clinicians will need to report data on all required measures in the Quality category for the full performance year (12 months).

CMS will also score and measure the Cost category for the full 12 month period as well. Since CMS gathers the Cost category information through Medicare claims data, no additional submission mechanism is required. If you do not participate in MIPS in 2020 you could be faced with a 9% penalty.

MIPS Performance Periods

Individual vs. Group Reporting

Eligible clinicians have the option to report as an individual, within a group, or within a virtual group.

An individual is a single National Provider Identifier, or NPI, tied to a single Taxpayer Identification Number, or TIN.

A group is a single TIN with two or more eligible clinicians (including at least one MIPS eligible clinician), as identified by their NPIs, who have reassigned their Medicare billing rights to the TIN. Participants are scored as a group and receive one payment adjustment based on aggregate performance.

A virtual group is a combination of two or more TINs assigned to one or more solo practitioners or one or more groups consisting of ten or fewer eligible clinicians that elect to form a virtual group for a performance period for a year. There is currently no limit on the number of TINs that can participate in a virtual group. Virtual Groups bring additional flexibility to the program, allowing clinicians to participate in MIPS with their peers, regardless of their geographical proximity or specialty. Those wishing to participate in a MIPS Virtual Group must make a formal election with CMS by December 31, 2019.

MIPS Individual and Group Reporting

Data for participants can be reported by various submission types by an individual or group as applicable. Alternatively, data may be reported by a Third Party Intermediary that submits data on measures and activities on behalf of a MIPS eligible clinician or group.

Selecting and Reporting Measures

The aim of the MIPS program is to provide clinicians and groups with the flexibility to select measures that best suit their practice. For the Quality category, participants can choose from several types of measures, which vary based on whether they are reporting as individuals or as part of a group. Submission methods are dependent on the types of measures chosen.

MIPS Data Collection

For the Improvement Activities and Promoting Interoperability categories, participants choose their measures from the QPP website. There are three submission methods for these measures.

  1. Direct: Users transmit data through a computer-to-computer interaction such as an API.
  2. Log-in and upload: Users log in with a set of authenticated credentials and upload and submit data in a CMS-specified format.
  3. Log-in and attest: Users log in with a set of authenticated credentials and manually attest that certain measures and activities were performed.

MIPS Requirements

Quality Category

Eligible clinicians are required to report six measures of their choosing for the Quality category. One of those measures must be an outcome measure. If no outcome measure is available, a ‘high priority’ measure must be reported in its place. High priority measures are contained in the following domains: outcome, appropriate use, patient safety, efficiency, patient experience, efficiency, and care coordination.

What are specialty measurement sets?

CMS developed specialty measure sets as a part of the available MIPS measures in the Quality Category. Participating clinicians must choose six measures to report within their specialty set. If there are fewer than six Quality measures to choose from in a specialty set, the clinician or group must complete all available measures contained in the set.

For anesthesia clients

SurveyVitals can help anesthesia clients who utilize a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) meet a measure–AQI 48 (anesthesia patient experience)–in the Quality performance category. Learn more here.

Improvement Activities

The IA category requires clinicians to participate in a combination of measures totaling 40 points to fully satisfy reporting requirements. Activities weighted “high” are worth 20 points, while “medium” weighted activities are valued at ten points. Clinicians and groups considered non-patient facing, and practices with 15 or fewer eligible providers and/or clinicians practicing in rural and health professional shortage areas, may face reduced reporting requirements. Learn more about these special exemption statuses here.

MIPS Improvement Activities

In order for a group or virtual group to attest to an improvement activity, at least 50% of the clinicians in the group or virtual group must perform the same activity during any continuous 90-day period in the performance year.

Your SurveyVitals solution can help you satisfy measures in the IA category. Download our “Roadmap to Improvement Activities” or contact us at info@surveyvitals.com to learn more.

Promoting Interoperability

The Promoting Interoperability category places an emphasis on interoperability and patient engagement with certified EHR technology. Eligible clinicians must report on certain measures from four ‘objectives,’ or claims exclusions if applicable. Scoring is performance-based at the individual measure level, for a total of up to 100 points. In 2020, organizations must use the 2015 Edition CEHRT.

Special Status

Clinicians and groups considered non-patient facing, and practices with 15 or fewer eligible providers and/or clinicians practicing in rural and health professional shortage areas, may face reduced reporting requirements. Watch the video below to learn more.

Anesthesia QCDR Reporting

SurveyVitals can help anesthesia clients who utilize a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) meet a measure–AQI 48 (anesthesia patient experience)–in the Quality performance category. We currently support NACOR (Anesthesia Quality Institute), Anesthesia Business Group, Anesthesia Quality Registry (ePreop), and Medaxion. Learn more here.

What are the current MIPS dates and deadlines?

December 31, 2019

Last day to make a virtual group election for the 2020 performance year

January 1, 2020

2020 performance year begins

January 2, 2020

Data submission period for the 2019 performance year begins

March 31, 2020

Data submission for the 2019 performance year closes

October 3, 2020

Last day to begin the continuous 90-day performance period for Improvement Activities

December 31, 2020

2020 performance year ends

How is MIPS different in 2020?

To learn about the changes from year 3 (2019) to year 4 (2020) of the MIPS program, see our article on the 2020 updates.

Does SurveyVitals administer CAHPS for MIPS?

Yes! SurveyVitals is a CMS-approved vendor ready to administer CAHPS for MIPS on behalf of your organization in 2019. The CAHPS for MIPS survey can be used to satisfy one Quality measure or one Improvement Activity.

Contact us at info@surveyvitals.com to learn more about our CAHPS program.

Interested in meeting measures with SurveyVitals?

Want to learn how SurveyVitals can help you prepare for MIPS? Subscribe to our MIPS update list below or email us at support@surveyvitals.com. You can also send us a message using the blue chat icon below to speak to a member of our support team.

*Note: Information and program details are based solely upon SurveyVitals’ experience with MACRA and our interpretation of CMS rule-making and policy statements. The information presented does not reflect the views or policies of CMS or any other governmental agency and is not to be construed as practice management advice.

Schedule a Demo

March 13th, 2019 Categories: Ambulatory and Outpatient Surgery, Anesthesia, CAHPS Surveys, Emergency Medicine, featured, MIPS Information, Neonatology, Outpatient Practice, Radiology, Urgent Care

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

2018 Year in Review

SurveyVitals 2018 Year in Review

SurveyVitals 2018 Year Stats

The patient experience is improving because of your dedication. Here are some remarkable metrics you were a part of in 2018.

Over 2 million surveys were completed last year, providing feedback on more than 31 million questions and bringing in over 2 million comments. Patient comments were overwhelmingly positive–there were 57 positive words for every one negative word!

Patients aged 64-75 years old were the best respondents, with the highest response rates for email, SMS, and overall. The most satisfied patients were males 25-34 years old for APSQ, and females 65-74 years old for SPSQ.

Our clients logged in over 124,000 times last year and received 138,000 low score alerts and 18,000 contact requests. This helped drive improvement in every area of care, but the most improved areas were Privacy Respected for APSQ and Communication for SPSQ.

Thank you for working with SurveyVitals to help your patients and your organization. We look forward to helping you continue to meet your patient experience goals in 2019!

Schedule a Demo

January 8th, 2019 Categories: Anesthesia, featured, Outpatient Practice, Patient Experience

Tags: , , , , , ,

Looking forward to 2019 with SurveyVitals

Looking forward to 2019 with SurveyVitals

2018 was an outstanding year for SurveyVitals and our clients. We launched a new and improved portal, released additional product features, and brought in over 2 million surveys!

As we head into 2019, we’re looking at revamping some existing features and adding new resources that will help our clients get the most out of the solution and meet their improvement goals. Let’s look at some of the things we have in store for the coming year.

Enhanced Reports

We’ve redesigned our custom reporting tool with improved benchmarks and better usability. More selections, new filters, deeper comment analysis, and better care team representation provide a faster, more intuitive, and more comprehensive look at your performance data.

SurveyVitals Reporting Example

Public Review

In 2018 we introduced the Public Review feature, which drives higher volumes of online reviews from verified patients and helps increase the online presence and reputation of our clients.

In 2019 we will continue to focus on enhancing Public Review to provide optimal benefits to our users and give them the ultimate competitive advantage.

Public Review Example

Learn More

Point of Care

Address patient concerns on the spot with our new Point of Care Tool. Enter minimal patient information into a user-friendly interface and administer a patient survey within seconds. Patients use their own devices and feedback is instant, saving on hardware costs and time.

SurveyVitals Point of Care Tool

Learn More

Improvement Resources

We want to support our clients’ improvement efforts and help them utilize the solution to its fullest potential. From videos to articles to quick tips and best practices, we’ll be creating resources and libraries to help our clients every step of the way.

Improvement Center Example

Patient Reported Outcomes

In 2019, we’re helping you to improve along the whole continuum of care with the Patient Reported Outcomes Survey. This survey, along with the Global Surgical Outcomes Survey, aims to identify gaps in care and reveal opportunities to improve patient outcomes. Email us at support@surveyvitals.com to learn more and get started.

Got Feedback?

Our solution is built on client feedback. What do you hope to see from us in 2019? Email us at support@surveyvitals.com and let us know!

Learn More!

January 8th, 2019 Categories: featured, Outpatient Practice, Patient Experience, Product Features, Reputation Management

Tags: , , , ,

New research finds unverified patient reviews an unreliable guide

Man Looking at Laptop

Unverified online patient reviews do not always correlate with actual patient experience, according to a new study published by the Mayo Clinic.

Can you trust what people say about doctors online?

That’s the question that researchers from the Mayo Clinic set out to answer when they started collecting data from online patient reviews in 2014. The results of the study, which were released in the April edition of the Mayo Clinic Proceedings, corroborate what physicians have been saying for a long time: Unverified online reviews often present an inaccurate depiction of physicians and their practices.

Here’s what happened.

Researchers collected online patient reviews for two groups: 113 physicians who had received at least one negative online review (<50% of possible score), and 113 physicians who had never received any negative online reviews. The researchers then tracked these physicians’ performance over the next several months using verified, tested patient satisfaction surveys. (similar to SurveyVitals’ 360° Survey Solution).

After analyzing the verified patient satisfaction scores, the results were clear: There was no correlation between negative online reviews and patient satisfaction scores.

So to answer the original question-

No, you can’t always trust what people are saying about doctors online.

Why it’s important.

In the digital age, online reputation is paramount to success. Not sure about that? Check out this study that found 54% of millenials look online before choosing a doctor.

Online reviews can create a ripple effect that impacts everything from choosing a doctor to perception of care received. As patients approach healthcare with an evolving consumer mindset, and as the healthcare industry shifts toward a pay for performance model, negative perceptions will inevitably damage an organization’s bottom line.

The unsettling part is that in most cases anyone can go online and write these reviews, regardless of whether or not they’ve ever interacted with the physician. This exacerbates the problem that the loudest voices on the internet tend to be the most upset, creating an unbalanced portrayal that isn’t necessarily representative of a practice’s entire patient population.

The researchers at the Mayo Clinic encapsulated this issue best when they wrote, “Perhaps the time has come for improved mechanisms to support health care organizations and their physicians to allow a more qualified and verified form of PSS scores to be included online in an attempt to overcome often single and unsubstantiated online reviews by open source online websites.”

So what can we do?

The best way to protect your organization’s online reputation is to share your verified patient ratings with the world. SurveyVitals’ Provider Widget is the easiest way to share and promote your verified reviews.

Here’s how it works.

The Provider Widget displays actual feedback from actual patients. Instead of unreliable, unverified reviews from strangers on the internet, the Provider Widget automatically gathers data from the patient population as they submit their patient experience surveys.

provider widget patient reviews

Ultimately, the verified reviews give patients the confidence they need in choosing a provider to treat them. SurveyVitals’ Provider Widget shows ratings from not just a few, but often from thousands of verified patient to generate a trustworthy source of information.

Harnessing the power of actual patient ratings creates a competitive advantage against peers who rely on unverified reviews. Patients who see the ratings on the Provider Widget know that they are getting an accurate representation of their provider’s performance.

Provider Widget

How to set up the Provider Widget.

If you aren’t currently utilizing the SurveyVitals solution, schedule a demo to learn more about how SurveyVitals can help your organization with patient experience surveys, CAHPS surveys, MIPS Improvement Activities, the Provider Widget, and more.

If you are already running the SurveyVitals solution, please contact your support team or email support@surveyvitals for help setting up your widget.

By providing the information and tools to help people make informed decisions, we can work toward making a better healthcare systems for both physicians and providers. Better insights can lead to better outcomes for everyone involved.

Learn More!

April 6th, 2018 Categories: featured, Outpatient Practice, Patient Experience, Product Features, Reputation Management

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

New Data Submission Interface for Quality Payment Program

New Data Submission Interface

On January 2, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) launched a new data submission system for groups and clinicians participating in the Quality Payment Program.

Here are some key points:

Clinicians now submit all their 2017 performance data in the same place.

Previously, under the various CMS legacy programs, clinicians had to use multiple mechanisms to submit performance data. CMS has now consolidated the data submission process to a single access point via an online portal, making it easier for clinicians and vendors to submit data.

The submission period for the 2017 QPP performance year runs from January 2, 2018, to March 31, 2018.

For groups using the CMS Web Interface, the submission period runs from January 22, 2018 to March 16, 2018.

How to submit performance data?

To submit performance data, clinicians must visit the QPP website. Once on the QPP website, users can login by entering their EIDM User ID and password. Users may have used this ID and password in the past to login to the CMS Enterprise Portal.

If you don’t have an EIDM User ID and password, you can create an account on the CMS Enterprise website.

In the portal, clinicians have the option to choose between multiple data submission options, including Qualified Clinical Data Registries (QCDRs), qualified registries, attestation, or the CMS Web Interface.

Data can be uploaded incrementally throughout the submission period. Groups and clinicians are not required to upload all of their data at once. However, all performance data must be uploaded before the submission period deadline.

For Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) participants, real-time initial scoring updates will appear as performance data is tallied on the site. This scoring may change as new data is uploaded, or if new benchmarks take effect. Note that special status, Alternative Payment Model (APM) status, and Qualifying APM Participant status (QP), will not initially appear in each category score.

Final scores will appear after the submission period closes.

For more information about the Quality Payment Program, see our guide.

Schedule a Demo

January 3rd, 2018 Categories: Anesthesia, featured, MIPS Information, Outpatient Practice

Tags: ,

Leave a Comment

Do Not Miss This MIPS Reporting Deadline

MIPS 2017

View up-to-date information on our MIPS resource page here!

Avoiding A MIPS Negative Payment Adjustment

October 2nd marks the very last day for eligible clinicians to start collecting MIPS data for partial year submission. If this fall reporting deadline is missed, clinicians and/or groups will not be eligible to receive a positive payment adjustment in 2019. Rather, they will be faced with two outcomes:

  1. Submit the minimum amount of data and receive a neutral payment adjustment
  2. Submit no data and receive a downward payment adjustment (up to -4%)

Given the flexibility of the MIPS program this year, it would be a missed opportunity for groups and clinicians to submit just 90-days of performance data to Medicare to earn a moderate positive payment adjustment – maybe even the max adjustment – in 2019. Learn more about MIPS and “Pick Your Pace” here.

MIPS Pick Your Pace

While it might seem a bit daunting if you haven’t started, there is still a short window of time for you and/or your group to select the required number of measures and get up and running before the partial submission deadline passes.

Partial Submission Pace

In order to participate in the ‘partial submission’ pace as outlined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, eligible clinicians and groups will need to submit 90 consecutive days worth of performance data to Medicare across the following MIPS scoring categories:

  • Quality Category: 6 Measures
  • Advancing Care Information: 9 measures
  • Improvement Activities: a combination of measures totaling 40 points

For clinicians in rural or health professional shortage areas, or for those clinicians considered non-patient facing or “hospital-based,” you may face reduced reporting requirements. Learn more about these special status groups under MIPS here.

Selecting A Submission Mechanism and Measures

Submission methods may vary based on the measure.

MIPS Submission Methods
Meeting Measures with SurveyVitals

Finally, SurveyVitals can help you meet a number of measures in the Improvement Activities category, including a high-weight activity. Additionally, SurveyVitals can submit data to your QCDR and help you administer CAHPS for MIPS. Want to learn more about meeting MIPS measures with SurveyVitals? Contact us at info@surveyvitals.com

Schedule a Demo

September 15th, 2017 Categories: Anesthesia, featured, MIPS Information, Outpatient Practice

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Next Page »

Recent Posts

Low Score Comment Prompts
New Feature: SPSQ Low Score Comment Prompts
December 16, 2019

Better understand patient concerns with our low-score survey logic, now included on our Standard Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (SPSQ). When patients select a score of a ‘1’ or ‘2’ on the five-point Likert scale for any standard survey question, they will be prompted to leave a comment describing their experience in that area. The long-term use […]

Public Review Just Got Better! Boost Your Google Business Reviews with this New Feature
December 13, 2019

Nearly 90 percent of patients look to online reviews when choosing a physician, so increasing a positive presence online is more important than ever. SurveyVitals’ Public Review feature helped healthcare providers and organizations proactively build their online reputation and improve their search rank in 2019. The feature drives verified patients to leave public reviews about […]

10 million patient experience surveys completed
10 Million Surveys!
November 25, 2019

Together with our clients, we reached 10 million surveys in the SurveyVitals comparative benchmark. Thank you for helping us achieve this incredible milestone! With over 16,000 clinicians across 85 specialties utilizing SurveyVitals at over 3,500 locations, we are excited to watch this benchmark continue to grow. Your partnership and each interaction with your patients strengthens […]

MIPS Final Rule 2020
MIPS 2021: MVPs and QCDR Changes Coming
November 6, 2019

Last week, CMS released the final rule for the changes to the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). While there are only minor changes to the program in 2020, bigger changes are expected in 2021. Here are two of the big takeaways from the final rule. MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs) CMS intends to move toward what […]